/lnnatic/

C'est la vie/ Every opinion stated is mine unless stated otherwise//

I have this fascination with shows set in the ‘60s-’70s USA. Mindhunter, Mad Men, and more shows are on my watchlist now that I have this realization. I know, coming from a Southeast Asian perspective, this is such a faraway dream. As a POC, I would be obliterated if I were to live in that era, not to mention in the USA. Hell, I might be a cleaner or some second-class citizen, not more than how they treated women and blacks back then. This is a controversial take, but please hear me out first.

Radio: On


The soundtrack plays a major part in this. Even before watching those shows, my playlists are filled with music from the past. Lou Reed and his Velvet Underground, Joy Division, The Smiths, and every musician from that era just get my earworm dancing. The meme of a girl wishing to live in the 90s perfectly summed up what I’m feeling. I never really resonated with the '90s, so I never understood their yearning. But now I do! 


Whispers of Loneliness


There’s something that screams loneliness and a void within oneself whenever I watch those shows, especially from the female characters. Maybe it’s coming from the nuclear family facade, the old traditional life of a patriarchal family. When meals are neatly prepped, every corners are spotless clean, and the green grass is always cut. But at the same time, the women lived only in the kitchen, the men in the office, the marriage was rotting inside, and society pressured each other to secretly get their own therapist. Everyone suffered under the facade of patriarchy. Even the feminist movement just started around that year! I mean, it’s such a dumb statement to romanticize the ‘60s-’70s era of the United States. But hey, the loneliness that comes from living within the societal pressure never leaves! Loneliness is nothing but a constant resonance. 


Going Analog


It might also be coming from the pace of life, where everything is not digital yet, and every seconds are not yet bombarded by millions of pieces of information streaming into our minds. They lived rather more slowly, manually, intentionally. Yes, with more subliminal advertisements surrounding them. But at least they still read, they didn’t doom scroll; they got out of the house, not bed rotting. Radios listened, newspapers read, televisions watched, letters written and typed. There’s nothing wrong with dreaming of a slower life with analog media, right?


Living Dandy


Loafers, suits, briefcase, oh how I love everyone looking all polished. For the alternatives, too, they look like their closets are full of fun. They would wear typical, trendy pieces, without individual choice and taste. But hey, they looked like their lives were put together! It’s easy on the eyes when men dress like they mean it. Coming from today’s free will, where most men mostly dress as if they couldn’t afford clothes. I’d rather have my men in suits and ties the whole day. Again, it’s a facade for the void, and I love it! And also, maybe it’s coming from the fact that I dreamed of a traditional type of masculinity. Despite my mysandry perspective on men. After all, nothing changes! Most of them are still evil, degrading, and disrespectful, cheaters, liars, but at least they look a lot more presentable than they did back then. If they’re innately evil, why not as well make it fashionable, right? Think of Lucifer, Don Draper, The Godfather, Peaky Blinders. Those are all charming devils, literally and metaphorically.


Modern Utopia


Economy, politics, science, education, everything changes. What’s constant is only change. So, of course, every era has its own pros and cons. To me, those shows, with limited narrations and set lives, serve as a distant utopia. They could live more slowly because the industry and work environment allowed them to. They could live dandy because fast fashion was not there yet. They were able to provide for a whole family, be a trophy wife, or get their dream job, because the ladder career was real. They could be happy because they were representing the privileged ones, the men, the management, the rich, the whites. 


It would not be a utopia if I watched other shows with POC as the main character, or from the perspectives of the women who lived in those eras. Those shows are supposed to show adversity, as a reenactment of the lives lived by the most privileged people in the USA, framed in romanticized versions. And here’s me, a POC from Indonesia, working-class cishet gal who’s struggling to provide for myself in this fucked-up economy. And ironically, I’m still within a small percentage of privileged Indonesians with bachelor's and master's degrees who don’t live as a sandwich generation, living free, far from home in Jakarta. Of course, ironically, those shows would still look like a dream to me, and I’d keep watching with all these privileges. 



Late late post drafted in 2023 and now just decided to fuck it. Let's just post it.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11316824/
© GDH

To be able to move on from her painful memories, Jean decided to change her life to be a minimalist. She seeks comfort in overwriting her memories, as she sells and gives back the things that used to be a bridge for all the relationships she had. She finds herself struggling half way, not expecting everything’s going as planned as her stoic persona. In the process, she learns what minimalism really is.

As a minimalist, this movie intrigues me from the moment I saw the poster. The concept of minimalism can be found in several documentaries and variety shows, though still uncommon to be found in mainstream movies.

Just like many pop movies, the topic of romance very much supports the whole plot, while also using minimalism basic principles to separate each segment. Not that I hate it, but sometimes the minimalism gets too sidetracked because of the main character’s sole purpose to redeem her guilt. With that being said, I’m going to discuss several things I disagree and agree with.

Four Points I Disagree with

1.      The monochrome aesthetic
A misconception of minimalism is that you have to limit the use of color in life, which is completely wrong. Minimalism in lifestyle and art/design correlates to each other but not necessarily to be applied together. In terms of art/design, minimalism refers to a particular visual style, but if we’re talking about lifestyle it’s more about the practice.

The sentence “less is more” perfectly describes minimalism, but it’s important to note that it differs for everyone. When the closet is dominantly colorful rather than monochrome, it doesn’t make you less of a minimalist. To be a minimalist is to get rid of all excessive and unnecessary stuffs, not solely to be aesthetically pleasing.

Buying aesthetically monochromatic stuffs to begin a minimal life is a wrong move. The point of it all is to use things you already have, so spending more money doesn’t seem to be theoretically right, no?

2.      The digital
Cloud storage has been a breakthrough for modern life, because everything can be permanently stored, regardless of the size. This is one of the best short-cuts to be a minimalist, but still it’s not for everyone.

Reading, for example, is a pleasure that depends on the individuals. PDF and e-books are countless and takes no additional space, but what if the freshly printed smells is the one that adds up the pleasure? Just like Marie Kondo says, “Does it spark joy? If it does, keep it.”

3.      The concept of letting go
The point of minimalism is to keep what’s essential, so to let go seems to be amiss. For beginners, letting go may be the main idea, but not for the concept in general. When you already have less stuff to take care of, what are you going to throw away?

Hence, there’s another concept closely related to minimalism known as decluttering. Every minimalist has their own period of decluttering, which can be monthly or weekly and it covers every aspect in life from physical, digital, to emotional.

When you were having a bad time and decided to be indulged in a stack of products you bought from online shopping, for example. That is when you need to declutter everything and look back for what’s essential. It can also be the endless pictures you’ve taken for a completed project, everything that happened within a flash and not relevant anymore.

4.      The idea that “throwing someone isn’t like throwing stuffs”
It can be. Jean decided to return all the things she borrowed from her friends and ex-boyfriend, but that’s only right because she’s in the wrong. Although she does it for the sake of her own self, to be free from her own guilt. When the person on the other hand is someone who reminds you some painful moments in your life, sometimes it’s better to just forget and move on.

Four Points I Agree with

1.      “You’re not going to remember what you put into the trashcan”
The first step of being a minimalist is to declutter and sort everything out, and it’s not as easy as it sounds. Just like what happens in the movie, there will be moments when you feel like giving up because of a sudden nostalgia.    

When memories take over, it’s going to be hard to let anything go. The easiest way to overcome it is to remind yourself that memories doesn’t live in things, it’s in us. Everything that happens in the past had been recorded somewhere in our heads already, so live in the moment and don’t worry about the past. After dealing with stacks of trash bags, you’re not going to remember what you’ve put into the trashcan anyway.

Still, it doesn’t mean you need to completely throw away every single thing. A photograph of your deceased grandparents doesn’t really take extra space, but their clothing does. To deal with it, there’s a lot of alternatives you can do with it.

2.      It doesn’t always have to end up in the trashcan.
In the beginning of the movie, Jean doesn’t want to sell her possessions but she eventually decides to do it for the sake of her office-renovation funding. This is the best option that can come out from decluttering, turning a stack of clothing into money.

For creative people, you can turn what you have into something else. Take the example of your grandparents clothing, the antique and old-school patterns can be turned into a nice handkerchief or even a new outfit with a whole different design. You can turn forgotten things into more daily relevant tools.

If you feel like being a good Samaritan, there’s always a place to donate. You don’t even need to donate formally, you can always ask anyone around you if there’s anything they’ve been feeling like buying but haven’t had the money for it.  

3.      “You can’t just pressure anyone and expect them to do it like you”
No matter how good the practice is, it’s always deemed to be bad by some people. Some people are more comfortable to be a maximalist rather than minimalist, and the difference lies on the value that they hold.

When you live with several people, whether it’s family or friends, you can’t be selfish. Jean pressures her mom because she wants to move on, and she sold her mom’s piano anyway. This is such a problematic choice of declutter.

Take a minimalist youtuber’s experience, Matt D’Avila, who lives with his non-minimalist girlfriend. Everything works well only when you can compromise with each other. Agree to disagree is the best way to settle things peacefully.

Even for minimalism itself, no standard exists. It’s about the essence of one’s life and no one can dictate what works for your life. Minimalist A may be using only two pairs of shoes because they work for home, but Minimalist B may need to change up until 6 shoes because their job includes meeting people in different settings.

4.      The destination
Jean decides to be a minimalist mostly because she feels the need to move on, aside from being an interior designer. She says minimalism is a way to let go many times and that is not the only truth out there.

For some people, minimalism can be very helpful for moving on but it is also very helpful for money saving. Imagine all the money you can save when you’re not busy checking out your shopping cart on market place. For some people, it can be the best option to be cleaner. With less stuffs you own, less dust to deal with.

The most important thing is that, minimalism takes you many steps closer to be free, free from the painful past, the overwhelming bills, the abundant nonsense from toxic people. Be free from anything that’s been holding you back and do it your own way.

Final Verdict
There’s nothing wrong in changing your life in order to move on, what’s wrong is when you pressured others to do the same. The ideas of minimalism that Jean applied in her life is not wrong, but not completely right as well. From a minimalist perspective, she does what she wants to do and that’s completely fine, and learns that not everyone is willing to do the same thing. Changing one’s life is a process, and it’s not an easy feat.

Regardless, she seems to be very hard-headed until the very end of the movie. Although she learns that most people aren’t on the same page as her, she decides to close her eyes and push anyone that stands in her way. The worse thing that comes out of this scenario is how she sets a single standard for everyone, which is very misleading for people who doesn’t have any idea about minimalism.

It irks me how she portrays minimalism as a white and black textbook when in fact it’s a colorful narrative. If I had to choose, I’d side with her friends and family who speaks some senses into her cold-hearted rules. The process of being a minimalist doesn’t need to be that painful.

7.5/10
By Source (WP:NFCC#4), Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63176354

© Universal Pictures, Blumhouse Productions

*Proceed only if you: have watched the movie or don't care about spoilers.

The Invisible Man (2020) is, above all, heartbreaking. It's so much more than a thrilling ghost story, it's about a man who ruins a woman's life by controlling her. The sad truth is that this exact thing is happening, even right now, as I type this.

In the patriarchal system, most women are used to being controlled by a man. It’s been years since women were expected to serve men in every way possible, in the living room, dining room, and mostly bedroom. It's as if we live just to take care of them, of course they do take care of us in terms of financial, but other than that we’re like no more than a servant. Household chores are supposedly a shared responsibility for everyone who lives under the roof, but let's put this aside for now. 

In this movie, we can see how heartbreaking it is to see a woman who fights for her rights, for her own freedom. Cecilia/Cee (Elizabeth Moss), has to put up with everything Adrien (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) tells her to do. Not only that she has to ask for her husband’s approval to dress-up and travel, she also has to think the way he wants her to think.

Rather than patriarchy in general, this can be called an abusive relationship, considering that the term is too broad for this case. I believe a man can still act nicely with a patriarchal system in mind, and as long as their partner wants to be in that position. Nevertheless, this case of abusive relationship stems from the men who abuse their power in a patriarchal society. When a man knows that he has power over the woman and uses it without considering the woman’s will, then it’s a toxic masculinity, a dark side of the patriarchal system.

Adrien knows how people won’t believe a wide-eyed anxious woman, a woman who rambles about her dead husband, a woman who tells everyone she’s the victim without having any clear evidence. He knows exactly how the society works and this is where the horror lies.

How many times have you seen headlines about women going on the court countlessly just to prove sexual harassment men did to them? Sexual harassment and law are having such complex relationship, but most of them time it’s only cornering the victim. It’s not easy to look for evidence when a stranger grabbed your intimate parts in a crowded bus, for instance, and not to mention the people who are doubting the event and framing the victim as somewhat delusional.

It’s so much harder when everyone chooses to doubt them instead of supporting and comforting. Questions like “are you sure that happened?” “maybe it was an accident,” “why didn’t you scream?” are only making it harder for the victim. Listening and staying by their side is the best option, but some people don’t seem to be capable of having this basic form of empathy.

As the story escalates, Cee becomes some sort of a delusional and psychopathic woman just as her husband wished. The plot is definitely heartbreaking to watch because I’ve heard similar stories from women in all places, all ages, and all religions. There are many women who even lost their sanity after being harassed and not being taken seriously by the people around them.

When the movie ends with Cee finally getting her revenge is when I get disappointed. Punishing Adrien with life-time sentence or any other revenge that takes time will be much more satisfying rather than killing him in a minute. Adrien harasses and abuses Cee for years, so it’s only right if he feels it too. I don’t condone abuse and harassment, except for rapists and abusers just like him.

In the end, I don’t think The Invisible Man refers to only men’s physical presence, but also all of their presence in every way possible. Every aspect in life that men with toxic masculinity and psychopathic tendencies expected women to do for them. This movie is heartbreaking, because of how real the issue is.

Final Verdict

Except for the ending and the half-cooked sci-fi aspect, the movie is actually one hell of a ride. The suspense and frustration are all there, but the sci-fi back story doesn’t really make sense. You can’t really say this as a sci-fi horror, because the science is only there for a small amount of the story. It doesn’t really explain and justify everything, it’s just there. On top of all, kudos for the represented issue.

7.5/10

Note: I know toxic masculinity and patriarchal system are two sensitive and complex topics to be discussed only in a paragraph, but this article was written to give you the general view of the issue represented in the movie. All opinions are completely mine and if you feel the need to correct or/and argue, then feel free to leave comments or contact me via Twitter.

© A24



*Proceed only if you've watched the movie or you don't care about spoilers.

Robert Eggers' The Lighthouse is a madness, metaphorically and literally. When two lighthouse keepers are being left on their own in an isolated island for God-knows-how-long, they begin to overthink everything. Beers are the only thing keeping them sane and mermaids are the object of their repressed sexual fantasy, only until pride and curiosity decide to take control. Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson successfully express all of this madness by exchanging equally mad sarcastic monologues.

Mad Background Story

When two strangers are stuck in an island, what can go wrong? Well, apparently everything. In an interview with The Verge, the director himself states that, “Nothing good happens when two men are alone in a giant phallus.” I’m not going to discuss about “men” in particular because I’m not a man, so I’m going to discuss how exhausting it must be when you’re isolated with a person you’re not in good terms with in general.

Now, imagine you’re stuck in an island with your boss, wouldn’t it be one hell of a place? I can really sympathize with Pattinson’s character not because I’ve been in an isolation with my boss, but being with people who act like they’re above everything must be exceptionally tiring.

There are some things that everyone feels like hiding, but when you don’t have anything to do in an isolation, anything in the shadows is becoming too interesting to miss out. Especially when the person directly asks you not to do anything with it. The thing is, human doesn’t like to be told what they can and can’t do. Just like Adam and Eve, it’s in our blood.

I completely understand why Pattinson tries hard to get to the light room. Pattinson has to do everything except going to the light room of the lighthouse and Dafoe acts like the light room is only accessible to him. When life is boring, sexual pleasure is being repressed, maintaining the whole building is tiring, and now you can’t even explore the building you’re in just because a grumpy old man says no? Pride and anger take charge.

Maybe that’s why Eggers states “men” in particular. Is it because of the pride that they have? There is a stereotypical assumption that men hold their pride higher than women and if this is what Eggers mean, then the two characters are like two matches ready to burn at all times.

But regardless of their gender, I think I’d also wreak havoc if someone says I can’t go to a room just for no reason, on top of the fact that the person treats me like their servant and behaves almighty. I’m not justifying Pattinson’s anger issue, but sometimes we just want to let it all out. Then again, maybe Pattinson doesn’t have anger issue, maybe it’s the isolation that does things to him.

As a person who’s currently living in an isolation (because lockdown and social distancing) like this is really the perfect time to watch another two people in isolation. Not to mention how hard the rain was when I was watching this two-hours movie, everything is just becoming too real. Hopefully, I won’t get mad just like they do.
If you or anyone you know is having a hard time with self-isolation, please seek for help. Remember to reach out to your friend and family, or professionals who offers psychological conversation. Stay strong, this too shall pass.
layanan konsultasi psikologi online gratis di seluruh indonesia di tengah pandemi covid-19

✨a thread✨
— ---- (@trenchcarnation) March 27, 2020


Mad Monologues and Performance

The surreal psychological horror gives you the creeps in a subtle manner. You won’t find any scary sightings or even bloody actions, regardless of some axe and fist fighting scene. The horrors are mostly carried out through revengeful monologues and facial expressions instead. When Dafoe curses Pattinson with folklore-like words, it feels as if he's Poseidon.
Do you think #WillemDafoe and #RobertPattinson deserved #OscarNoms for their performances in #TheLighthouse? @A24 pic.twitter.com/WykMq7VJQt
— Screenplayed (@Screenplayed) January 15, 2020
Another great monologue is from Pattinson’s character where he provokes his subordinate with vulgar and honest opinion.
Watch how Robert Pattison and Willem Dafoe brought #TheLighthouse script to life in this exclusive clip. pic.twitter.com/8tOgIFypKD
— Screenplayed (@Screenplayed) October 31, 2019

In The Lighthouse, the character’s sentiments towards each other is enough to keep me stick to my chair.

Mad Aesthetic and Cinematography

Black and white movie shots with a classic ratio 1.19:1 really sets the mood. The square-ish ratio successfully makes me feel trapped just like the characters. The lack of colors also stresses how boring it must be to live in an island when no technologies for entertainment purposes weren’t invented yet. All they can do is working, chatting, and questioning everything.

When the two character aren’t busy exchanging dialogues, the camera focuses either on the island or facial expressions. This is the kind of film where you have to wait patiently and figure out whether the object in the frame is some kind of foreshadowing or not, it makes me think. The fact that the movie was actually nominated in 2020’s Oscar for the best cinematography doesn’t surprise me at all, it’s totally Oscar-worthy.
'The Lighthouse (2019, Robert Eggers). Cinematography: Jarin Blaschke pic.twitter.com/fEOSFxupPW
— Lost In Film (@LostInFilm) December 24, 2019


Final Thought

The Lighthouse is madness and I love madness, that’s it. The plot, the characters, and the cinematography are great, but for some reasons it doesn’t leave any lingering emotions in me. Also, because I feel like they can do more about the surreal scenes, rather than just only using mystical creature (mermaid) for the sake of sexual pleasure and symbolism for the character's self-control. Nevertheless, still a great movie.
8.6/10

Older Posts Home

IG

Topics

After Cinema Thoughts Been There Done That Design EPH Fiction How This World Works Literary Response Literature Class Movie Review Not So Gamer Thoughts Personal Poetry Pop Culture Pop Culture Recap recommendation list The Internet Loves It Thoughts of the Papers What to Watch
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (1)
    • ▼  February (1)
      • Lonely in the '60s: How That Era Speaks to Me
  • ►  2025 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  2020 (10)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
  • ►  2019 (6)
    • ►  November (6)
  • ►  2017 (16)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2016 (19)
    • ►  June (19)
  • ►  2014 (2)
    • ►  December (2)

Copyright © /lnnatic/. Designed & Developed by OddThemes