/lnnatic/

C'est la vie/ Every opinion stated is mine unless stated otherwise// linnaamanda.carrd.co //

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11316824/
© GDH

To be able to move on from her painful memories, Jean decided to change her life to be a minimalist. She seeks comfort in overwriting her memories, as she sells and gives back the things that used to be a bridge for all the relationships she had. She finds herself struggling half way, not expecting everything’s going as planned as her stoic persona. In the process, she learns what minimalism really is.

As a minimalist, this movie intrigues me from the moment I saw the poster. The concept of minimalism can be found in several documentaries and variety shows, though still uncommon to be found in mainstream movies.

Just like many pop movies, the topic of romance very much supports the whole plot, while also using minimalism basic principles to separate each segment. Not that I hate it, but sometimes the minimalism gets too sidetracked because of the main character’s sole purpose to redeem her guilt. With that being said, I’m going to discuss several things I disagree and agree with.

Four Points I Disagree with

1.      The monochrome aesthetic
A misconception of minimalism is that you have to limit the use of color in life, which is completely wrong. Minimalism in lifestyle and art/design correlates to each other but not necessarily to be applied together. In terms of art/design, minimalism refers to a particular visual style, but if we’re talking about lifestyle it’s more about the practice.

The sentence “less is more” perfectly describes minimalism, but it’s important to note that it differs for everyone. When the closet is dominantly colorful rather than monochrome, it doesn’t make you less of a minimalist. To be a minimalist is to get rid of all excessive and unnecessary stuffs, not solely to be aesthetically pleasing.

Buying aesthetically monochromatic stuffs to begin a minimal life is a wrong move. The point of it all is to use things you already have, so spending more money doesn’t seem to be theoretically right, no?

2.      The digital
Cloud storage has been a breakthrough for modern life, because everything can be permanently stored, regardless of the size. This is one of the best short-cuts to be a minimalist, but still it’s not for everyone.

Reading, for example, is a pleasure that depends on the individuals. PDF and e-books are countless and takes no additional space, but what if the freshly printed smells is the one that adds up the pleasure? Just like Marie Kondo says, “Does it spark joy? If it does, keep it.”

3.      The concept of letting go
The point of minimalism is to keep what’s essential, so to let go seems to be amiss. For beginners, letting go may be the main idea, but not for the concept in general. When you already have less stuff to take care of, what are you going to throw away?

Hence, there’s another concept closely related to minimalism known as decluttering. Every minimalist has their own period of decluttering, which can be monthly or weekly and it covers every aspect in life from physical, digital, to emotional.

When you were having a bad time and decided to be indulged in a stack of products you bought from online shopping, for example. That is when you need to declutter everything and look back for what’s essential. It can also be the endless pictures you’ve taken for a completed project, everything that happened within a flash and not relevant anymore.

4.      The idea that “throwing someone isn’t like throwing stuffs”
It can be. Jean decided to return all the things she borrowed from her friends and ex-boyfriend, but that’s only right because she’s in the wrong. Although she does it for the sake of her own self, to be free from her own guilt. When the person on the other hand is someone who reminds you some painful moments in your life, sometimes it’s better to just forget and move on.

Four Points I Agree with

1.      “You’re not going to remember what you put into the trashcan”
The first step of being a minimalist is to declutter and sort everything out, and it’s not as easy as it sounds. Just like what happens in the movie, there will be moments when you feel like giving up because of a sudden nostalgia.    

When memories take over, it’s going to be hard to let anything go. The easiest way to overcome it is to remind yourself that memories doesn’t live in things, it’s in us. Everything that happens in the past had been recorded somewhere in our heads already, so live in the moment and don’t worry about the past. After dealing with stacks of trash bags, you’re not going to remember what you’ve put into the trashcan anyway.

Still, it doesn’t mean you need to completely throw away every single thing. A photograph of your deceased grandparents doesn’t really take extra space, but their clothing does. To deal with it, there’s a lot of alternatives you can do with it.

2.      It doesn’t always have to end up in the trashcan.
In the beginning of the movie, Jean doesn’t want to sell her possessions but she eventually decides to do it for the sake of her office-renovation funding. This is the best option that can come out from decluttering, turning a stack of clothing into money.

For creative people, you can turn what you have into something else. Take the example of your grandparents clothing, the antique and old-school patterns can be turned into a nice handkerchief or even a new outfit with a whole different design. You can turn forgotten things into more daily relevant tools.

If you feel like being a good Samaritan, there’s always a place to donate. You don’t even need to donate formally, you can always ask anyone around you if there’s anything they’ve been feeling like buying but haven’t had the money for it.  

3.      “You can’t just pressure anyone and expect them to do it like you”
No matter how good the practice is, it’s always deemed to be bad by some people. Some people are more comfortable to be a maximalist rather than minimalist, and the difference lies on the value that they hold.

When you live with several people, whether it’s family or friends, you can’t be selfish. Jean pressures her mom because she wants to move on, and she sold her mom’s piano anyway. This is such a problematic choice of declutter.

Take a minimalist youtuber’s experience, Matt D’Avila, who lives with his non-minimalist girlfriend. Everything works well only when you can compromise with each other. Agree to disagree is the best way to settle things peacefully.

Even for minimalism itself, no standard exists. It’s about the essence of one’s life and no one can dictate what works for your life. Minimalist A may be using only two pairs of shoes because they work for home, but Minimalist B may need to change up until 6 shoes because their job includes meeting people in different settings.

4.      The destination
Jean decides to be a minimalist mostly because she feels the need to move on, aside from being an interior designer. She says minimalism is a way to let go many times and that is not the only truth out there.

For some people, minimalism can be very helpful for moving on but it is also very helpful for money saving. Imagine all the money you can save when you’re not busy checking out your shopping cart on market place. For some people, it can be the best option to be cleaner. With less stuffs you own, less dust to deal with.

The most important thing is that, minimalism takes you many steps closer to be free, free from the painful past, the overwhelming bills, the abundant nonsense from toxic people. Be free from anything that’s been holding you back and do it your own way.

Final Verdict
There’s nothing wrong in changing your life in order to move on, what’s wrong is when you pressured others to do the same. The ideas of minimalism that Jean applied in her life is not wrong, but not completely right as well. From a minimalist perspective, she does what she wants to do and that’s completely fine, and learns that not everyone is willing to do the same thing. Changing one’s life is a process, and it’s not an easy feat.

Regardless, she seems to be very hard-headed until the very end of the movie. Although she learns that most people aren’t on the same page as her, she decides to close her eyes and push anyone that stands in her way. The worse thing that comes out of this scenario is how she sets a single standard for everyone, which is very misleading for people who doesn’t have any idea about minimalism.

It irks me how she portrays minimalism as a white and black textbook when in fact it’s a colorful narrative. If I had to choose, I’d side with her friends and family who speaks some senses into her cold-hearted rules. The process of being a minimalist doesn’t need to be that painful.

7.5/10

https://upinteriors.com/space/photo/white-bedroom-with-floor-bed-dl-house-by-urbastudios/
 © URBAstudios

Pernah dengar konsep Minimalism dan Intermittent Fasting? Konsep minimalisme sudah banyak diaplikasikan di kehidupan sehari-hari, sedangkan konsep yang satunya baru mulai sering dilontarkan para selebriti luar negeri sebagai jenis diet favorit mereka. Menariknya, kalau kamu anak kosan, dengan catatan demografik kelas menengah ke bawah, mungkin sudah lama hidup dengan konsep ini. How come? Ya karena dua konsep ini dasari hal yang sama: nggak bikin kantong kering.

Minimalisme bukan cuma estetika semata, konsep ini adalah konsep lifestyle yang akan sangat bermanfaat untuk semua jenis kalangan, khususnya anak kosan. Semua diawali saat saya sering gabut dan scrolling Pinterest. Sebagai orang yang kalau beli baju lewat online shop bisa sebulan lima kali, tidak kerasa baju saya sudah menggunung di dalam lemari. 

Saya yang saat itu sedang sering down berpikir bahwa aktivitas konsumerisme dapat membuat saya lebih bahagia, selayaknya sistem yang menawarkan kondisi hidup yang lebih baik dengan memiliki barang-barang mahal. Walaupun banyaknya baju di lemari saya amat sangat memadai untuk tidak memakai baju yang sama untuk sebulan, saya hanya pakai baju yang itu-itu saja, which is masalah yang sangat relatable untuk banyak orang.  

Saya mulai risih sendiri dengan padanan baju yang membosankan dan mulai mencari inspirasi di Pinterest. Di sinilah saya terekspos dengan Capsule Wardrobe, konsep berpakaian untuk orang-orang dengan gaya hidup minimal. Dengan hanya dua kaus, dua blus, tiga jenis celana, dan dua jenis luaran, ternyata saya bisa mempadu-padankannya untuk berbagai aktifitas selama berbulan-bulan. Dengan adanya pilihan yang terbatas, kreatifitas pun ikut jalan, waktu untuk siap-siap jadi lebih cepat, dan kata Matt D’Avila, seorang youtuber minimalisme, menyuci baju tidak akan bikin capek lagi.

Semenjak itu saya tertarik untuk mempelajari lebih lanjut apa sebenarnya dan bagaimana penerapan teori minimalisme. Mulai dari buku The Minimalist yang ditulis dua sahabat mantan budak kapitalisme hingga video dari Youtuber seperti Matt D’Avila dan Rachel Aust. Dari buku itu saya mengerti alasan kenapa aktivitas konsumerisme yang menghidupi kapitalisme tidak membuat saya lebih bahagia. Seperti kata The Minimalist, fokus ke aktivitas dan hubungan yang ada di hidup ini, bukan ke materi yang di akhir hanya akan menjadi tumpukan sampah. 

Saya sadar kalau yang saya harus lebih banyak keluar kosan dan melihat dunia secara langsung dibandingkan hanya rebahan dan mengharapkan sehelai kaus dengan motif polkadot akan membuat saya senang. Memang saya senang, tapi hanya sesaat bila dibandingkan dengan aktifitas nyata seperti mengikuti komunitas relawan misalnya. 

Perlu dipahami, minimalis tidak sama dengan pepatah “money won’t bring you happiness” ya. Secara personal, uang juga membantu saya untuk mengikuti kelas kerajinan dan membeli tiket kereta api untuk berlibur ke Jogjakarta, misalnya. Tapi memang semuanya kembali lagi ke hal apa yang ingin dibatasi dengan konsep minimalisme ini. 

Merasa sudah hidup seperti ini karena faktor biaya dan merasa baik-baik saja? Congrats! Karena memang hidup akan lebih berarti saat kamu tidak berpegangan dengan materi-materi fisik.

Tapi ada satu pandangan yang menyimpang, minimalisme bukan berarti barang yang kamu miliki harus berestetika minimalis ya, tapi lebih ke kegunaan barang itu sendiri. Misalkan kamu hanya punya dua kaus dengan motif yang ramai, yang notabene berseberangan dengan teori  desain minimalis, bukan berarti kamu harus membeli kaus baru dengan warna monokrom. 

Dari documenter The Minimalist, kamu bisa lihat banyak orang yang menyukai pakaian dengan berbagai macam pola dan warna tetap hidup lancar sebagai minimalis. Cocok banget kan untuk gaya hidup anak kosan melarat? Hidup minimalis itu menekankan fungsi dari materi, bukan hanya estetika untuk feed Instagram. Kalaupun iya, sah-sah saja karena toh itu hak mereka.

Untuk makan pun, konsep yang satu ini juga merembet ke minimalisme. Untuk tipe anak kosan seperti saya yang jarang ngemil dan makan berat maksimal dua kali sehari, diet ini kayanya tidak akan susah diterapkan. 

Selain karena faktor finansial, saya pikir saya tidak harus sering olahraga karenanya. Sebenarnya mau bagaimanapun pola makannya kita harus tetap rajin berolahraga, tapi beginilah logika saya yang pemalas. Saya yakin banyak anak rantau lainnya yang memiliki pola makan seperti ini, sampai saya membaca sebuah artikel seorang selebriti dengan diet Intermittent Fasting. 

Lebih dengan mengatur waktu mengkonsumsi makan daripada membatasi jenis makanan, inti dari diet yang satu ini adalah jeda waktu. Bisa dibilang mirip dengan konsep puasa setengah hari, sebagian metode dari diet ini mengharuskan kamu untuk tidak makan apapun selama 16 jam di luar jam makan siang. Selama masa “berpuasa” ini kamu boleh tetap minum ya, asal bukan minuman dengan gula seabrek seperti brown sugar dan boba milk tea. 

Tren ini mulai ngetren dicoba artis Hollywood mulai dari Kourtney Kardashian, Hugh Jackman, sampai penjaga galaksi, Chris Pratt. Jadi untuk kamu-kamu yang biasanya merapel makan, sadar nggak sadar kamu sudah hidup sehat dan modern nih.

Kalau sudah paham konsep-konsep modern yang intinya more is less ini rasanya kamu jadi lebih sah untuk menyombongkan diri. Daripada menjelaskan dengan alasan “karena aq misqueen,” sekarang kamu bisa bilang “hey, ini gaya hidup modern ala artis Hollywood.” 

Lagian apa urusan mereka ngata-ngatain anak merantau yang sedang berjuang untuk masa depan yang lebih baik? Biarin aja kamu pakai baju yang itu-itu aja dan makan seadanya, yang penting kebutuhan dasarmu sudah aman. Satu pesanku untuk sesama anak kosan di luar sana: you’re doing great sweetie.


By Source (WP:NFCC#4), Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63176354

© Universal Pictures, Blumhouse Productions

*Proceed only if you: have watched the movie or don't care about spoilers.

The Invisible Man (2020) is, above all, heartbreaking. It's so much more than a thrilling ghost story, it's about a man who ruins a woman's life by controlling her. The sad truth is that this exact thing is happening, even right now, as I type this.

In the patriarchal system, most women are used to being controlled by a man. It’s been years since women were expected to serve men in every way possible, in the living room, dining room, and mostly bedroom. It's as if we live just to take care of them, of course they do take care of us in terms of financial, but other than that we’re like no more than a servant. Household chores are supposedly a shared responsibility for everyone who lives under the roof, but let's put this aside for now. 

In this movie, we can see how heartbreaking it is to see a woman who fights for her rights, for her own freedom. Cecilia/Cee (Elizabeth Moss), has to put up with everything Adrien (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) tells her to do. Not only that she has to ask for her husband’s approval to dress-up and travel, she also has to think the way he wants her to think.

Rather than patriarchy in general, this can be called an abusive relationship, considering that the term is too broad for this case. I believe a man can still act nicely with a patriarchal system in mind, and as long as their partner wants to be in that position. Nevertheless, this case of abusive relationship stems from the men who abuse their power in a patriarchal society. When a man knows that he has power over the woman and uses it without considering the woman’s will, then it’s a toxic masculinity, a dark side of the patriarchal system.

Adrien knows how people won’t believe a wide-eyed anxious woman, a woman who rambles about her dead husband, a woman who tells everyone she’s the victim without having any clear evidence. He knows exactly how the society works and this is where the horror lies.

How many times have you seen headlines about women going on the court countlessly just to prove sexual harassment men did to them? Sexual harassment and law are having such complex relationship, but most of them time it’s only cornering the victim. It’s not easy to look for evidence when a stranger grabbed your intimate parts in a crowded bus, for instance, and not to mention the people who are doubting the event and framing the victim as somewhat delusional.

It’s so much harder when everyone chooses to doubt them instead of supporting and comforting. Questions like “are you sure that happened?” “maybe it was an accident,” “why didn’t you scream?” are only making it harder for the victim. Listening and staying by their side is the best option, but some people don’t seem to be capable of having this basic form of empathy.

As the story escalates, Cee becomes some sort of a delusional and psychopathic woman just as her husband wished. The plot is definitely heartbreaking to watch because I’ve heard similar stories from women in all places, all ages, and all religions. There are many women who even lost their sanity after being harassed and not being taken seriously by the people around them.

When the movie ends with Cee finally getting her revenge is when I get disappointed. Punishing Adrien with life-time sentence or any other revenge that takes time will be much more satisfying rather than killing him in a minute. Adrien harasses and abuses Cee for years, so it’s only right if he feels it too. I don’t condone abuse and harassment, except for rapists and abusers just like him.

In the end, I don’t think The Invisible Man refers to only men’s physical presence, but also all of their presence in every way possible. Every aspect in life that men with toxic masculinity and psychopathic tendencies expected women to do for them. This movie is heartbreaking, because of how real the issue is.

Final Verdict

Except for the ending and the half-cooked sci-fi aspect, the movie is actually one hell of a ride. The suspense and frustration are all there, but the sci-fi back story doesn’t really make sense. You can’t really say this as a sci-fi horror, because the science is only there for a small amount of the story. It doesn’t really explain and justify everything, it’s just there. On top of all, kudos for the represented issue.

7.5/10

Note: I know toxic masculinity and patriarchal system are two sensitive and complex topics to be discussed only in a paragraph, but this article was written to give you the general view of the issue represented in the movie. All opinions are completely mine and if you feel the need to correct or/and argue, then feel free to leave comments or contact me via Twitter.

Newer Posts Older Posts Home

@lnnaamnd

@lnnatic

Topics

After Cinema Thoughts Been There Done That Design EPH Fiction How This World Works Literary Response Literature Class Movie Review Personal Poetry Pop Culture recommendation list The Internet Loves It What to Watch
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2020 (10)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ▼  April (3)
      • 8 Things I Disagree and Agree with in Happy Old Ye...
      • Hidup Modern Ala Anak Kosan
      • The Invisible Man (2020): When a Man Ruins a Woman...
    • ►  March (5)
  • ►  2019 (6)
    • ►  November (6)
  • ►  2017 (16)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2016 (19)
    • ►  June (19)
  • ►  2014 (2)
    • ►  December (2)

Copyright © /lnnatic/. Designed & Developed by OddThemes